| dc.description.abstract |
This report seeks to investigate a key intersection of academic and practical learning
in social work training: the assessment of students on placement and the challenges
for practice-based assessors in assessing a failing student. Department of Health
(2002) requirements for social work education require that students spend at least
200 days in practice learning (in at least two settings); gain experience of
undertaking 'statutory' social work tasks (involving legal interventions); and provide
services to at least two different service user groups. These practice placements are
assessed by practice educators, either placed within organisations, or by
independent assessors. Whilst academy-based social work educators generally
have recourse to such support mechanisms as collegial discussion, opportunities for
moderation and codified assessment procedures when making assessment
judgments, the experience of the practice assessor is potentially more isolated – and
certainly less well documented. What are practice educatorsʼ experiences and views
of the ʻchallengingʼ or ʻfailingʼ student on social work placements? What strategies
have proved productive in supporting a failing student and what outcomes have
educators observed? The present study seeks to answer these questions and to
capture and codify some key principles and practices accordingly. In line with recent
discussions and concerns within the profession regarding assessment of social work
students on placement (Basnett & Sheffield, 2010), the study proffers a sustained
and specific focus on the experiences and perceptions of practice educators (PE) to
determine their views of the ʻdifficult studentʼ, and their sense of the support they
require from academic colleagues in order to reach judgments and to implement
interventions. |
en_US |